A discussion on the roman army

If so, that kind of suits with my plans. He could swim or cross rivers in boats, build bridges and smash his way into forts. The legions were split up into smaller units comparable in size to the auxiliary regiments of the Principate. Those that read this will know that this is a biased opinion and must take it for his value, and that is to the reader to decide.

It would still be an oligopoly and real power remain concentrated in the hands of the few, although if the establishment is canny enough to continue recruiting from outside its ranks there's no reason it the republic couldn't continue for many more centuries. An A discussion on the roman army was a soldier who was not a Roman citizen.

Mostly this would operate as a result of patronage or recommendations from influential aristocracy, but in time it gradually evolves to become an institution with standardised training or if not training at least examinations to confirm training in the field and pre-requisites.

Velites, Roman skirmishers, would place themselves at the very front of the formation and begin firing. Limitanei, the unwanted brother of the Comitateses. After Andronikos II took to the throne, the army fell apart and the Byzantines suffered regular defeats at the hands of their eastern opponents, although they would continue to enjoy success against the crusader territories in Greece.

The numbers grew to a peak of aboutby 33 legions and c. Polybian improvement upon the Camillian 4. The size of the 4th-century army is controversial. My edit was made purely for the sake of consistency, and I stand by neither convention for this article: Best, Haploidavey A discussion on the roman army Alongside troops raised and paid for directly by the state the Komnenian army included the armed followers of members of the wider imperial family and its extensive connections.

The numbers grew to a peak of aboutby 33 legions and c. Their primary function was to deter usurpations. In the 1st and early 2nd centuries, they were mainly Italian aristocrats performing the military component of their cursus honorum conventional career-path.

Around 80 AD, a minority of auxiliary regiments were doubled in size. The great problem was the use of large forces of mercenaries. He divided his forces to better protect the Empire, divided the civil and militar command, appointed regional commanders to take care of problem at the lowest level, passed conscription laws that helped the army to recover its lost manpower in the last century, improved militar infrastructures and improved the supply system.

They equipped themselves with shields, long spears and body armor in the form of bronze or hardened leather cuirasses.

The soldiers were the best trained, they had the best weapons and the best armour. This was reflected in better pay and benefits. The evidence is that cavalry was much the same proportion of overall army numbers as in the 2nd century and that its tactical role and prestige remained similar.

Alongside troops raised and paid for directly by the state the Komnenian army included the armed followers of members of the wider imperial family and its extensive connections. The most senior centurion, the primus pilus, was elevated to equestrian rank upon completion of his single-year term of office.

The sixth century BC king Servius Tullius was credited with first organizing this army into five classes of soldiers, each carrying equipment based on their wealth, and creating units of a standard size from these men.

The "Roman legion" article states correctly, I believe that there are 59 each of centurions, optios, etc. The role of cavalry in the late army does not appear to have been enhanced as compared with the army of the Principate.

What was life like in the Roman army?

In contrast, the infantry retained its traditional reputation for excellence. On completion of their minimum term, auxiliaries were awarded Roman citizenship, which carried important legal, fiscal and social advantages.

In contrast, the infantry retained its traditional reputation for excellence. Until about 68 AD, the auxilia were recruited by a mix of conscription and voluntary enlistment. The granting of pronoia holdings, where land, or more accurately rights to revenue from land, was held in return for military obligations, was beginning to become a notable element in the military infrastructure towards the end of the Komnenian period, though it became much more important subsequently.

A few decades afterwards, the Western army disintegrated as the Western empire collapsed. To elaborate with some questions, were criminals allowed in?

The interpretation of this trend has fuelled an ongoing debate whether the army adopted a defence-in-depth strategy or continued the same posture of "forward defence" as in the early Principate.

Such an institution would, at least in my opinion, greatly stabilise the military element of the roman republic which is half the struggle. At this point, the distinction between legions and auxilia became moot, the latter becoming all-citizen units also.

In the same book the failing of efficiency in the West can be traced to Frigidus.

Decimation: Roman Army, Cadornas Army or Both?

I haven't done any archaeology to find what the earlier primary convention was or what led to the inconsistency. A simple breakdown of the Roman army around this period is one army was made up of 5 to 6 legions.

The most senior centurion, the primus pilus, was elevated to equestrian rank on completion of his single-year term of office.I may suggest the Osprey books, they have a couple of books about the Roman Army composition, equipment and tactics in the various moments of Roman expansion (Republic-Principate-Late Empire).

The Republican Army. The army of the Roman republic was not the Roman army as we usually picture it. It was an army similar to others of the period, but their style of combat led Rome from an obscure city-state in the 8 th century BC to the dominant force in Italy and beyond by the end of the 2 nd century BC.

lietuvosstumbrai.com is a military history encyclopedia, journal, and travelogue of the ancient Roman army. The site is intended as a comprehensive, open-ended resource of articles, images, and maps.

We aim to foster collegial discussion of the Roman military, its weapons and armor, order of battle, deployment, warfare, and archaeology, among other.

I always smile, when people say, the roman army was just infantry plus a few equites. Rememeber, that about 60% of an imperial roman army were non-roman units. I recommend to read Arrians report about the battle against the Alans, if you like to know, how to beat eastern cavalry armies with a roman army.

Sep 09,  · Most students of WW1 know that General Luigi Cadorna, Chief of the General Staff of the Italian Army, was the most brutal, most cruel, most ruthless a Decimation: Roman Army, Cadornas Army or Both? - Austro-Hungarian Land Forces Discussion Forum. Roman Army Talk has 5, members.

What follows are the guiding principles of Roman Army Talk, established almost twenty years ago on our international.

Download
A discussion on the roman army
Rated 4/5 based on 62 review