Are the methods robust and well controlled? That is, were the effects on reproduction, survival, dry weight or something else?
It will help you make the right decision. When I recommend revisions, I try to give clear, detailed feedback to guide the authors. For me, the first question is this: If I find the paper especially interesting and even if I am going to recommend rejectionI tend to give a more detailed review because I want to encourage the authors to develop the paper or, maybe, to do a new paper along the lines suggested in the review.
Just pretend that it's your own research and figure out what experiments you would do and how you would interpret the data. My reviews usually start out with a short summary and a highlight of the strengths of the manuscript before briefly listing the weaknesses that I believe should be addressed.
If your work has been supported by a grant, you would also give credit for that in this section. The RNA content of the nucleolus and nucleolus-like inclusions in the anther of Lilium estimated by an improved RNase-gold labelling method.
I try to link any criticism I have either to a page number or a quotation from the manuscript to ensure that my argument is understood.
For example you should have checked your manuscript for the above-mentioned common problems and against general style guidance beforehand.
Experience confirms great scope for ambiguity even among terms like coliforms, total coliforms, faecal coliforms and thermotolerant coliforms when these are inadequately distinguished in a single paper.
The title, "A Biology Lab Report", tells the reader nothing. There should not be unnecessary duplication between them. Ask yourself honestly whether this paper falls within the scope of your expertise.
I think a lot of reviewers approach a paper with the philosophy that they are there to identify flaws.
Colby Custom Publishing Generally, most references will be to the primary literature i. I try hard to avoid rude or disparaging remarks. Having said that, I tend to define my expertise fairly broadly for reviewing purposes.
If I feel there is some good material in the paper but it needs a lot of work, I will write a pretty long and specific review pointing out what the authors need to do. If there are serious mistakes or missing parts, then I do not recommend publication.
I always read the paper sequentially, from start to finish, making comments on the PDF as I go along.Writing and Presenting Scientific Papers (2nd edition) Writing and Presenting Scientific Papers is not about the experton ourdesk. Iwouldrecommend thisbook tostudents, searches (Chapter 8), training students in writing (Chapter applied or water used are described.
Differences in crop spe), and reviewing papers and presentations.
This page features a discussion of each of the following components of writing a scientific review article: Choosing a topic and finding articles; If you need to write a review article but don't know where to start, keep some of these tips in mind.
What is the thesis or problem being addressed in this paper? a guide to writing scientific papers Scientific experiments are demanding, exciting endeavors, but, to have an impact, results must be communicated to others.
A research paper is a method of communication, an attempt to tell others about some specific data that you have gathered and what you think those data mean in the context of your research. GUIDELINES FOR WRITING SCIENTIFIC PAPERS The reviewing process 10 H) Resources 4 WRITING AND PUBLISHING SCIENTIFIC PAPERS Poor writing is one of the principal reasons why many scientific papers are rejected by reviewers.
Water South Africa Water SA Wildlife Monographs Wildlife Monogr Guide for Writing in Chemistry The major goal of a scientific paper is not to simply articulate Types of Writing in Chemistry A literature review summarizes research published by other authors focused on a Literature Review common topics.
Occasionally, authors will publish a review of a large body of. Research Papers on the Problem of Water Pollution Water Pollution Problem Research Papers delve into an example of an order placed on giving a description of the problem and how it started and possible plans that would alleviate the problem.Download